Thursday 10 October 2013

The extent and nature of connection in history

In September [2013] a headmaster predicted most exams would be undertaken only by computer/tablet devices within 10 years. Five days later a news report stated that Lloyds List [substantially a ‘factual’ publication related to shipping and insurance], with a 279-year print history, will be available only in electronic format after 20 December 2013. A survey indentified that only 25 subscribers read the paper, as distinct from the digital, edition. These two items indicate that the digital and computer revolution sweeps on but can further consequences be predicted? How many saw a link between the development of out-of-town retail parks and diminished ‘High Street’ prosperity? It can be claimed that there is no necessary connection: improved access to high streets and parking provision could have made different situations.

These comments bring to mind how historians seek to establish connections between events. In the Sempringham office we admire the approach of Michael Oakeshott on these questions [see On History, Basil Blackwell, 1983]. Oakeshott claims historians can not provide overarching reasons for historical events but only evidence that one event was connected to another. Oakeshott provides a memorable analogy, quoted in Undergraduate History Study – The Guide to Success by Gilbert Pleuger [Sempringham, 1997]:
‘When an historian assembles a passage of antecedent events to compose a subsequent he builds what in the countryside is called a ‘dry wall’: the stones (that is, the subsequent event) are joined and held together, not by mortar, but in terms of their shapes. And the wall, here, has no premeditated design; it is what its components, in touch, constitute.’ [On History, p. 94]
If this view is accepted then History students are freed to see the analysis and claims of ‘causal connections’ presented in History books as historian's attempts to pattern History in a step to understand and present the past but that is not the same as to claim that such analyses are a 'picture' of what really was the past.

Contributor: Geoff Williams. Sempringham [ehistory.org.uk] eLearning Office.